Multiple (Choose one of the 3 below ) Term Paper

Multiple (Choose one of the 3 below ) - Term Paper Example Americans wanted to overhaul former systems used in forming social frameworks in previous years prior to the Lincoln’s era. Changes after reconstruction had so much pronounced effects that the current US politician and social structures are attributed to efforts committed to ensure change at that period. As an illustration to changes derived from the reconstruction era, the US congress remains with a vested power of impeaching an incumbent president in office even today. Basically, assassination of Abraham Lincoln and attempts on impeachment of President Johnson remains as the chief historical landmarks in the reconstruction period. In the process of its development, the US reconstruction era took a multi-facet approach in addressing issues of the aggrieved parties at that time. One approach employed to achieve change during this period focus on general changes achieved immediately after the American civil war from 1861-8165. The civil war marked profound struggles between the south and the north regions of the country. Reconstruction majorly dwells on state of southern states, since consequences of the civil war became more practical within the region as compared to the northern states. Immediately after the war, numerous civil and military changes took place in restructuring inherent systems of governance1. In this case, reconstruction era entails detailed study of changes and developments within the 12-year period after the civil war. The second facet focuses on administrative and social transformations that took place within America’s southern states under the federal leadership of Lincoln and Johnson. Like any other historical struggle in American heritage, reconstruction period had its own motivating factors during planning and execution of its strategies. These motives derives its roots from ideological concepts adopted during the civil war are. The main cause of civil war traces its roots to political and social difference in opinions betw een republicans at the south and democrats at the northern states. As a result of the difference in philosophical inclinations, southern states forces under the name radical republicans stages a systematic attack on the northern states. In return, northern democrats counteracted southern efforts through appropriate military measures2. Upon termination of the war period, radical republican ideologies still remained dominant within the southern citizens. In this context, various democrat led institutions wanted to impose proper governance and social systems into the south. On the other hand, southern radicals were determined in frustrating efforts committed by their northern counterparts. Main objectives of the era included a desire to achieve an equal society with minimal effects of slavery philosophies. Prior to the civil war period, African Americans lived under harsh conditions as slaver for the white insurgents in southern states. After the civil war, white insurgency wanted to m aintain this slave-master status quo in order to sustain economic and social classes in their societies. These ideologies were met by stiff opposition from northern states, who though the post civil war period was supposed to reconstruct social structures in a positive manner. In this regard, reconstruction ushered in adoption of civil rights ideologies and suppression of insurgence power in southern state

Summary 3 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words - 1

Summary 3 - Essay Example On the other hand, other people like and encourage the violence in hockey. They see it as a customer magnet. Clubs sponsors and media also demand this violence since it increases profits as games are sold out and papers sell(Miedzian, 187). Therefore, a child who views these players are inclined to think naturally and Little does he or she know that the extreme violence he sees often grows more out of the owners commercial interests than players inclinations as players who do not participate in violence endanger their jobs(Miedzian, 188). A child knows violence outside sports is disapproved of but violence in sports is approved of by society. This unbalances the child who thought sports is about skill and talent but now knows sports is about winning and it means doing anything to win bad or good(Miedzian, 189).What are sports all about? It is about competitiveness not to win but to be the best. It is also about being a task master, by setting goals and achieving them. It is having self-esteem and confidence in